This post will discard all previous discussions on otomeity.
Otomeity is defined as a set of concerned love and avoidant hatred. We use AND, not OR because these 2 quantifiable objects are always tangential.
Tangential variables must appear in pair and they must be linearly independent. Denote any 2 2D vectors, a and b, they are tangential when cos\theta of below dot product (i.e scalar product, which is matrix multiplication of a pair of matrics transpose to each other) is zero, i.e. \theta = \frac{\pi}{2}:
Cov{a,b} = a ‧ b = |a||b| cos\theta
Note that dot product and covariance are equivalent.
This results in a rectangular hyperbola:
|a||b| = c (a constant)
where a,b,c are NEVER equal to zero and ALWAYs positive.
Like indifference curve in microeconomics, the tangent to the rectangular hyperbola is a budget line like this:
where |p| = total budget and m, n are NON-ZERO and POSITIVE quantities.
The existence of tangential relationship, therefore, implies that love and hatred exist in form of duality which cannot offset each other completely. In OJA STUDIES, tangential relationship is always applied to every linear variables to achieve the aim of making dialectics.
There are 2 basic pairs of tangential variables in otomeity:
{Functional otomeity, Ordinary Otomeity}
{Analogue Otomeity, Digital Otomeity}
If you perform Cartesian products on these 4 variables, the tangential relationship will remain valid, given the following conditions, denoting any 3 variables i, j, k:
Condition 1: Cov{i, j} = 0
Condition 2:
|i|/|k| = a constant > 0 exclusive or
|j|/|k| = a constant > 0
For example:
Cov{Functional Otomeity, Ordinary Otomeity} = 0
AND
Cov{Analogue Otomeity, Digital Otomeity} = 0
AND
|Functional Otomeity| / |Digital Otomeity| = constant > 0
which implies that:
Cov{Functional Otomeity, Analogue Otomeity} = 0
AND
Cov{Ordinary Otomeity, Digital Otomeity} = 0
AND
|Ordinary Otomeity| / |Analogue Otomeity| = constant > 0
Tangential relationship helps reduce the dimensions of the 4 variables from 4 to 2 such that we can represent the geometry in a 2D Cartesian coordinates plane:
D = Functional Otomeity
V = Ordinary Otomeity
O = Digital Otomeity
H = Analogue Otomeity
This model is very important in OJA STUDIES as its use is quite versatile. We call this model Ojalytic Diagram and the following formulas are established:
D/O = V/H = K (a constant)
DH = VO = kC (constants)
where C = Doremotional Product
= Sum of Human Civilizations
OJA STUDIES interprets reality so all jargon in the former should be easily translated to general English. In fact, we have the following laymen terms for the above otomeities:
D = Moral
V = Violence
H = Sexual Appeal
O = Reason
Another set:
D = Virtue
V = Karma
H = Sexuality
O = Individual Difference
For example: VO = constant,
i.e. If your IQ is too high or too low, you will get bullied easily because people tend to eliminate Individual differences for the ease of social control. In the process of bullying, those who is being bullied loses karma.
Note that there 4 official jargon for the above 4 capital letters:
Again, O_x has a dimension of time where K has the dimension of frequency. So the greater the value of K, the more individual difference of one would be of.
Note that the area under curve, i.e. \frac{K O_x^2}{2} is meaningless without an aikolistatic function which measures the mainstreamness of a person.
Then we introduce the second law of hentaicity such that hentaicity and ojality are tangential variables as well:
H_a =\frac{H_x}{O_x} = \frac{kK H_c}{D_y^2}
Note that H_a measures the naturalness of a behavior. For example, it is natural for males to erect their own penis when a female is nude. So in general female nudism has higher extent of naturalness, given the heterosexuals predominate over homosexuality spectra (i.e. LGBTQIA2S+), and the males behave such without much individual difference.
Next, we have some less-mathy theories in doremotional studies:
FT Theory
Fundamental/Technical Analysis
DG Theory
Differentiated/General Doremotion
DT Theory
Doremotional/Technical Analysis
Doremotional studies is applying core theories in OJA STUDIES to every ideological realms such that the discourse is compatible with the general public. We use jargon in core theory but we use non-specialist terms in outputing theories in doremotional studies, i.e. all audiences should understand the latter without knowing any core theory. We are making common sense.
Fundamental Analysis and Technical Analysis are tangential vectors in finance: We read financial statements in former and linear regression stuff in latter.
In fundamental analysis, the realm of knowledge is still finance itself while in technical analysis, thr realm is out of finance: we rely solely on statistics, which is an external knowledge beyond the scope of finance.
In investment, we can't rely sole on solely either of the analyses. We need to know if a share has robust financial wellbeing, as well as the patterns of the investors in stock markets.
Now we appropriate the aforementioned analyses from finance to every ideological realms. For example, in music appreciation, we need to know music theory (fundamental analysis) as well as audience's tastes (technical analysis) in order to market.
General doremotion is those ideologies being generally acceptable. For example, we agree that all gadgets from Doraemon ar just science fiction such that no scientists will be stupid enough to attempt making a time machine to travel to the past.
Differentiated doremotion is those ideologies engendering conflicts between audiences. For example, masculine audiences will avoid watching magic girl genres as they resist feminity, while feminine audiences do the opposite: This mirrors conflicts in gender identities among audiences.
Both general doremotion and differentiated doremotion are tangential, i.e. no ideology has 100% unity and no ideology has 0% consensus, because individual differences always exist. For example, in abnormal psychology, everyone has deviance and like normal distribution, no one is of IQ 0 or 200 (i.e. extrema).
Doremotional Analysis means interpretation of ideology using core theory in OJA STUDIES. Sole use of it will makes the discourse unable to be read by any laymen.
Technical Analysis means interpretation of ideology using external knowledge not from OJA STUDIES. For example, we use metaphysical tools (e.g. Gann Theory) to day trade in financial market without reading even financial statements: this is complete speculation of no financial significance.
So in doremotional studies, both doremotional analysis and technical analysis must be tangential, i.e. co-exist, in order to communicate with audiences of different disciplines, otherwise the analysis will become either ivory tower or tabloid.