HKDSE M2 Question Review (Enrichment only)

Question:

Wiki a Math term Convergence and study about the limit of a sequence online, then try to attempt the subquestions below:

(a) Show that 2^n/n! converges to zero when n tends to infinity, given n is a positive real integer.

(b) Hence, show that e < 3.

1個讚

Solution to part (a) :

Denote a sequence s_n = 2^n/n!

common ratio = s_(n+1) / s_n

= (2^(n+1)/(n+1)!)/ (2^n/n!) = 2/(n+1)

For n > 1, taking limit on n, we have 2/(∞+1) = 0

The sequence will converges to zero.

Solution to (b) :

e^x = 1/0! + x/1! + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + …

= 1 + x(1/1! + x/2! + x^2/3! + … )

< 1 + x(1 + x/2 + x^2/4 + …)

= 1 + x( (x/2)^n - 1) / (x/2 -1))

Put x = 1 and n = ∞, we have:

e < 1 + 1/(1 - 1/2) = 1 + 1/(1/2) = 1+2 = 3

Next question:

Find n such that (n-1)! + 1 = n^2,

where n is a positive real integer.

Solution:

For n > 1, (n-1)! must be an even number.

We start iteration of n from 3, 5, and forth,

then we notice that 4! = 5^2 - 1 = (5+1) (5-1) = 24.

Q.E.D.

試下 Mathjex work唔work:

\begin{align*} e^x &= \frac{1}{0!} + \frac{x}{1!} + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + \dots \\ &= 1 + x\left(\frac{1}{1!} + \frac{x}{2!} + \frac{x^2}{3!} + \dots \right) \\ &< 1 + x\left(1 + \frac{x}{2} + \frac{x^2}{4} + \dots \right) \\ &= 1 + x \left( \frac{(x/2)^n - 1}{x/2 - 1} \right) \end{align*}

Put x = 1 and n = \infty, we have:

e < 1 + \frac{1}{1 - 1/2} = 1 + \frac{1}{1/2} = 1 + 2 = 3
1個讚

Putting x=2 will yield 2 indeterminates:

1^∞ and 0/0

I wonder how to wipe out the singularity.

Due to the degree of x in the numerator of the geometric sum, the domain of x will be limited to (-2, 2). So, putting x= -3 or 3 will lead to divergent series. The singularity cannot be removed because the degree of x in the denominator is always 1.

BTW, the Mathjax can't save the Latex output as SVG or other image formats.:turtle:

Right click -> Copy to clipboard -> SVG Image.

I know, but the SVG option is grey and thus can't clicked.

Aha.
It works if you set the Math Renderer to SVG in Math Settings.

Got it.

Alternative proof: