[OJA STUDIES] Introducing common questioning formats

As titled, OJA STUDIES is just a thinking framework built by user DutalaTortoise(烏大龜). You know he is an ENFJ exercising auxiliary psychological function as introverted intuition, so he will often introspect, i.e. record what he thinks. Since this forum supports MarkDown, Mathjax and advanced clipboard manipulation, it is ideal for him to publish the fruition in this forum.

Generally, communication between ivory tower and reality is a key skill of study and work. OJA STUDIES is a library of jargon, and we call it Core Theory. Also, OJA STUDIES needs to be comprehensible by the general public, and we call the parsing of Core Theory into laymen terms Doremotional Studies, or equivalently Ideological Studies.

Here we show the nuances between 2 common questioning formats, i.e. Core Theory and Doremotional Studies.

Look at this sentence:

Academia is partial aikolidynamism.

You see a coined phrase, which is not comprehensible by just looking up dictionaries. In Core Theory, we interpret it as:

In academia, there are many partial aikolidymes fucking around(圍威喂).

You see another coined phrase such that the general public can't comprehend what the fuck it means. So in Doremotional Studies, we will rephrase the whole expressions for the general public who do not have access to the Core Theory library:

In academia, pundits of vested interests very often build citadels of access as a threshold preventing the rivals from grabbing the brainchilds of the builder.

Look, it is more elegant than just throwing out jargon from OJA STUDIES such that everyone knows what you mean. This is a paragon of effective communication by practising Doremotional Studies inviting all wakes of life to participate in it.

Now, we have a glance at the common question paper formats in OJA STUDIES:

  1. Core Theory:
  • Free Response
  • Essay
  • Multiple-Choice Questions
  1. Doremotional Questions

The weighing of the above 2 papers is the same. In paper 1, we use jargon, while in paper 2, we use common sense.

Below shows the naunces of the paper formats.

Normalize the appearance of Wario into standard body proportions of an adult.

This is clearly Core Theory questioning format because we find a keyword Normalize in unusal contexts. In OJA STUDIES, it means removal of sexuality traits.

Now look at another question:

Write an essay on the globalization of autism.

It looks like Doremotional Studies, but actually it is not the case. The questioning format is still Core Theory because you need even more jargon beyond the library in OJA STUDIES. In fact, technical knowledge in mental healthcare is expected.

For another instance:

Which of the following statements regarding an otaku is INCORRECT?
A. Female otakus does not exist in reality.
B. Female otakus are impure MKs.
C. A male pure otaku had sexuality before maturity.
D. Otakus are both collectivists and individualists.

The answer is A. It tests for a concept in Core Theory otakuism which appears in the study of animeitics (i.e. the spontaneity of anime-related phenomena inpacting reality).

Last but not least, look at the question below:

Why do females perform poorer than males in higher mathematics?

This is a typical Doremotional Question because you are expected to explain the concept of Logic Programme, which is a concept in Core Theory, to every audience, especially those who have never seen the Core Theory terms. The model answer will appear like this:

The logic of presentation, usually demonstrated by male mathematics teachers, is often incomprehensible by most of the females who learn procedurally because the teachers often skip the key steps of the solutions. In other words, the problem-solving heuristics introduced by the teachers have failed to transfer as intuition, which is a static trait of a person, cannot be instantiated by postnatal means.

Doremotional Studies is like IELTS Writing Task 2: You are NOT allowed to show off specialist knowledge; instead, you need to paraphrase, elucidate or even juxtapose what you say so that the audiences will understand what you mean accurately. It is the assessment of the civility of yourself.